X
AI-powered vulnerability remediation often fails because it lacks context about how your applications actually work. Runtime intelligence solves this by providing AI with real-world application behavior data, architecture insights, and dependency information. This context-aware approach reduces remediation time by up to 87% while eliminating the false positives that plague traditional scanning.
Every month, applications accumulate an average of 17.5 new vulnerabilities while teams struggle to fix just six. AI promises to accelerate remediation, but there's a fundamental challenge: AI tools that analyze code in isolation generate fixes that often break in production.
Think of it this way: asking AI to fix code without runtime context is like asking a mechanic to repair your car based only on a photo of the engine. They might suggest technically correct solutions that don't account for your specific model's quirks, previous modifications, or how you actually drive.
This context gap explains why development teams spend hours adapting AI-generated fixes. The AI doesn't know that your payment endpoint handles 10,000 requests per minute, uses a specific framework, or integrates with three downstream services. Without this intelligence, even sophisticated AI produces generic patches that require extensive rework.
AI-generated fixes fail because they lack runtime context about your application's actual behavior, frameworks, and integrations. Without understanding how code executes in production with real data and load patterns, AI produces generic patches that break when deployed to your specific environment.
Runtime intelligence changes the game by showing AI how your application actually behaves in production, not just how the code is written. This approach captures the full picture: which code paths execute, how data flows through functions, what frameworks you're using, and which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable.
Runtime intelligence is real-time data about how your application actually behaves in production, including code execution paths, data flows, framework usage, and performance patterns. This intelligence transforms AI from generating generic fixes to creating production-ready solutions tailored to your specific environment.
The Contrast Graph embodies this runtime approach by creating a living model of your application security. Unlike traditional scanning that provides point-in-time snapshots, the Graph continuously updates with observations from running code.
When AI has access to this runtime intelligence, the transformation is dramatic. Instead of generic fixes, it generates solutions tailored to your specific environment, frameworks, and performance requirements. This is why runtime-powered AI achieves near-zero false positives while traditional approaches struggle with accuracy.
The difference between traditional and runtime-powered approaches becomes clear when fixing real vulnerabilities. Traditional scanning analyzes static code and generates generic fixes that often fail due to false positives. Runtime-powered AI observes actual production behavior and generates environment-specific fixes that work immediately, reducing remediation time by 87%.
When traditional scanning finds a SQL injection vulnerability, the process typically looks like this:
This happens because traditional tools analyze code structure without understanding execution context. They can't tell which code actually runs, what data types flow through it, or how it integrates with other systems.
With runtime intelligence, the same SQL injection fix becomes precise and production-ready:
The runtime approach eliminates guesswork. AI knows exactly how your application works, not just how it's coded.
| Aspect | Traditional AI Remediation | Runtime-Powered AI |
| Context Source | Static code analysis | Live production behavior |
| Fix Accuracy | Generic templates | Environment-specific solutions |
| Time to Deploy | Hours of manual adaptation | Minutes to implement |
| Framework Awareness | None | Complete understanding |
| Performance Impact | Unknown until production | Pre-validated |
| Integration Testing | Required extensive testing | Pre-verified compatibility |
Contrast SmartFix, introduced in the Northstar release, demonstrates how runtime intelligence transforms AI remediation from theory to practice.
SmartFix leverages the Contrast Graph's runtime observations to understand your complete application context before generating fixes. This means understanding not just the vulnerable code, but also the business logic around it, the frameworks in use, and the performance constraints.
For example, when addressing a SQL injection vulnerability in a search endpoint, SmartFix doesn't just parameterize queries. It understands your search patterns from production traffic, maintains performance for your specific load, and preserves the user experience while eliminating the vulnerability.
This context-aware approach extends beyond individual fixes. SmartFix can generate complete pull requests with:
The result: fixes that work the first time, without extensive developer adaptation.
The impact of runtime-powered AI extends beyond individual fixes to transform your entire security posture.
Speed: Critical vulnerabilities that traditionally take 84 days to remediate can be fixed in hours or days. This acceleration comes from eliminating the back-and-forth of adapting generic fixes.
Trust: Developers trust fixes based on actual application behavior rather than theoretical vulnerabilities. When AI understands your production reality, its suggestions become immediately actionable.
Scale: Runtime-powered AI can generate fixes for hundreds of vulnerabilities simultaneously, each tailored to its specific context. This parallel processing breaks through the traditional bottleneck of sequential manual remediation.
According to Contrast Security research, organizations using runtime-powered remediation report an 87% reduction in mean time to remediate, transforming what was once a months-long process into a matter of days.
Implementing runtime-powered AI remediation starts with understanding your current context gap. Traditional scanning tools in your pipeline provide valuable development-time insights, but they lack the production intelligence needed for effective AI remediation.
Implementation involves deploying lightweight sensors through your existing CI/CD pipeline that observe application behavior without code changes. These sensors build runtime intelligence immediately, enabling AI-powered remediation for both new and existing vulnerabilities.
The implementation process follows these steps:
For organizations already using AI for code generation and development, adding runtime context to remediation is a natural evolution. The same AI that helps write code can now fix it effectively, when given the right context.
Traditional scanning analyzes code structure at a point in time, missing how applications actually behave in production. Runtime intelligence observes real execution patterns, data flows, and framework interactions as they happen. This difference means AI can generate fixes that account for your actual environment rather than theoretical vulnerabilities.
Organizations typically see an 87% reduction in remediation time compared to manual processes. Critical vulnerabilities that traditionally take months can be addressed in hours or days because the AI-generated fixes are production-ready, not generic templates requiring adaptation.
Yes, runtime intelligence complements your existing security investments. Development-time tools like SAST and DAST continue providing early vulnerability detection, while runtime intelligence adds the production context needed for effective remediation. The combination creates a complete security lifecycle.
Implementation involves deploying lightweight sensors through your existing CI/CD pipeline. These sensors observe application behavior without code changes or performance impact. The runtime intelligence they gather immediately enhances AI remediation capabilities for both new and existing vulnerabilities.
Runtime intelligence dramatically reduces false positives by observing which code actually executes and which libraries are truly in use. This real-world validation means AI only generates fixes for genuine vulnerabilities, not theoretical risks that never manifest in production.
AI fixes break because they're generated without understanding your specific frameworks, data patterns, and integrations. Traditional AI only sees code structure, not how it actually executes with real data under production loads. Runtime intelligence provides this missing context.
Yes, runtime intelligence complements AI coding assistants by providing the production context they lack. While Copilot helps write code, runtime intelligence ensures fixes work in your actual environment. The combination enables both code generation and effective remediation.
Organizations report 87% faster remediation, eliminating roughly 70 hours of developer time per month previously spent adapting generic fixes. With reduced false positives and faster deployment, most organizations see 5-10x ROI within the first quarter of implementation.
Runtime sensors work with any application that runs, regardless of age or technology stack. Legacy applications often benefit most since they have complex, undocumented behaviors that runtime intelligence can capture automatically, eliminating the guesswork in remediation.
Yes, runtime intelligence is designed for modern architectures. It works seamlessly with containers, microservices, serverless functions, and cloud-native applications, automatically adapting to dynamic environments and auto-scaling infrastructure.
The future of application security isn't just about finding more vulnerabilities or generating more fixes. It's about providing AI with the intelligence to fix the right vulnerabilities effectively. Runtime intelligence makes that future possible today.
Jake Milstein is Vice President of Corporate Marketing & Communications at Contrast Security, where he drives awareness of Application Security and Application Detection & Response (ADR). Before entering cybersecurity, Jake spent much of his career leading newsrooms and newscasts at CBS, Fox, NBC, and ABC affiliates nationwide, earning multiple Emmy and Edward R. Murrow awards. He has since led sales and marketing teams at leading cybersecurity companies, helping customers stop breaches with Managed Detection and Response (MDR), Application Detection and Response (ADR), and a wide range of consulting services.
Get the latest content from Contrast directly to your mailbox. By subscribing, you will stay up to date with all the latest and greatest from Contrast.
