Imagine you're a lifeguard at a beach, but you're only allowed to watch from a helicopter or from a camera mounted on the boardwalk. Sure, you’ll see some splashing — maybe even a shark fin or two — but if something happens beneath the waves when you’re looking the other way, you’re completely in the dark.
That’s how most security teams operate when it comes to application-layer threats. Traditional tools like EDR and WAF are great at scanning the surface — endpoints, traffic patterns, system behavior. But when something sneaky happens deep inside the application, they’re often blind to it. WAFs are stuck filtering noisy traffic with limited context, while EDRs don’t look beyond the OS. This leaves a gaping blindspot — and it’s exactly where modern attacks love to hide.
Let’s break it down.
WAFs were built to protect web applications from common threats — some SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), etc. But they rely heavily on static signatures and pattern matching. So when attackers get clever with obfuscation or abuse app logic in unexpected ways, WAFs start firing off alerts without truly understanding what’s going on. That leads to a flood of false positives — a nightmare for security operations center (SOC) teams trying to triage.
EDRs, on the other hand, focus on endpoint activity — things like process creation, file changes and system calls. But if an attacker exploits a vulnerability in custom application code — say, a business logic flaw — an EDR won’t see it. It’s not designed for that layer.
Recent research backs this up. We wanted to see how well different security tools actually worked against real-world attacks. So, our research team at Contrast Labs put them to the test. We tried various types of attacks that target the inner workings of applications. Think of these attacks like someone trying to break into your house in different ways:
We tested our Contrast ADR platform alongside other common security tools: EDR (which watches computers) and WAF (which watches website traffic).
Here’s what we found:
In short, our testing showed that many common security tools can miss important attacks or give too many false alarms, while Contrast ADR gives a much clearer picture of what’s really happening inside your applications.
In sum,
Contrast Security Application Detection and Response (ADR) flips the script. Instead of watching from the outside and guessing what’s going on inside the app, it works from the inside out. It uses lightweight sensors embedded right into the application runtime, giving it a direct view of what’s happening — in real time.
This “instrumentation” approach means ADR can:
All of this data is collected and refined automatically — no manual correlation required. It’s clear, actionable and directly tied to what’s going on inside the app.
With Contrast ADR, security teams can stop chasing shadows and start focusing on real threats. Here’s what that looks like in practice:
ADR doesn’t ask you to rip and replace your existing stack. It integrates seamlessly with your current SOC workflows and tools, feeding rich, app-layer attack data straight into your SIEM. That means better correlation, more complete visibility and stronger defenses — without starting from scratch.
Application-layer threats aren’t going away — in fact, they’re growing more common and more complex. But with Contrast ADR, you’re no longer stuck guessing what’s going on beneath the surface.
It’s time to fill in the gaps and take control of your application security.
Ready to see what you've been missing? Try out the Contrast ADR sandbox and experience firsthand how deep visibility makes all the difference.
Get the latest content from Contrast directly to your mailbox. By subscribing, you will stay up to date with all the latest and greatest from Contrast.