With zero-day exploits on the rise, organizations need robust defenses designed to protect their applications against known and unknown threats. Contrast ADR provides continuous detection and prevention of known and zero-day attacks by leveraging threat sensors inside of applications. It offers an instrumentation-based approach that protects applications and APIs against entire classes of vulnerabilities.
Zero-day vulnerabilities are software flaws unknown before exploitation. Put another way, they are unknown flaws in software with no patch or fix available, and for which no pre-existing signatures or trained detection models exist.
Zero-day vulnerabilities are those still “in the wild,” as in, no vendor has patched them yet. If ethical security researchers identify a vulnerability, they notify the vendor or responsible organization so that a patch can be issued before the vulnerability is communicated.
Zero days pose a severe cybersecurity risk due to the lack of immediate patches. These vulnerabilities are often exploited by malicious actors before vendors can address them, leaving systems exposed and vulnerable.
Zero-day vulnerabilities pose a higher risk to users for the following reasons:
A zero-day exploit is the method or technique that an attacker uses to take advantage of a zero-day vulnerability to gain unauthorized access or cause harm to a system. It's the actual code or sequence of actions that leverages the unknown flaw.
It’s important to note that a zero-day exploit is different from a zero-day attack:
A novel attack refers to a new method or technique used by attackers. This could involve a zero-day vulnerability, but it could also be a new way to chain known vulnerabilities, bypass existing security controls or use entirely new tactics that haven't been seen before. The focus is on the newness of the attack methodology.
A zero-day application exploit works by taking advantage of an unknown vulnerability in software before the vendor or developers are aware of it and can issue a patch. Here's a breakdown:
Essentially, a zero-day exploit is a race against time. Attackers try to exploit the unknown vulnerability before the vendor can patch it, while defenders try to detect and mitigate the attack before significant damage is done.
Many of the biggest cybersecurity compromises began as zero-day vulnerabilities, including the Log4j2 vulnerability and the Spring4Shell vulnerability. The Sony compromise of 2014 is another significant attack that exposed a zero-day vulnerability.
Other notable, recent zero-day vulnerabilities:
The prevailing mindset within many security teams is that proactive protection against zero days is impossible before a vulnerability is known. This belief shapes current defensive strategies.
Consequently, teams often focus on reactive measures, including investing heavily in advanced detection capabilities on endpoints and networks to find attackers after they've breached defenses, rapidly patching systems once a zero-day patch becomes available or disabling critical services in response to security bulletins — all acknowledging a period of unavoidable exposure.
This reactive posture stems from the limitations of conventional tools:
This lack of deep application context means detection often occurs only after compromise, reinforcing the belief that proactive defense is unattainable and forcing reliance on imprecise responses (IP blocking, process kills) that cause collateral damage.
Contrast ADR challenges this paradigm. By operating inside the application runtime, we provide the necessary deep visibility and behavioral context to accurately detect and precisely respond to unknown threats, offering proactive protection by addressing entire classes of vulnerabilities, not just individual known vulnerabilities.
While zero-day exploits and attacks represent a growing risk, Contrast ADR provides the deep application context needed for effective real-time detection and protection, going beyond the limitations of traditional defenses and OS-level monitoring.
Ideally, software would never contain any potential vulnerabilities. This level of perfection would ensure that zero-day exploits never arise in the first place.
In reality, achieving this level of security is impossible. While zero-day vulnerabilities can likely never be eliminated completely, it is possible to prevent zero-day exploits by instrumenting applications with protection that focuses on behavior anomaly detection as opposed to known attack signatures.
Contrast ADR provides real-time detection of active zero-day exploits by analyzing activity within the application at runtime. This deep visibility allows for the identification of subtle anomalies indicative of novel attacks that other tools may miss. By analyzing behavior within the application context, Contrast ADR can pinpoint malicious activity targeting unknown vulnerabilities, effectively exposing threats that would otherwise go undetected.
Beyond just identifying attacks, Contrast ADR proactively blocks entire classes of vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection and path traversal attacks, rather than merely patching individual issues. This capability enables the neutralization of novel zero-day attacks instantly, as ADR understands the underlying attack techniques rather than relying solely on attack signatures. By detecting attacks based on what code actually does and leveraging deep runtime context, Contrast ADR distinguishes real attacks from noise with high fidelity, offering robust protection against zero-day exploits.